Some Tea Party-Backed Lawmakers Yield in Obamacare Fight
The first cracks are appearing in the Tea Party’s push to dismantle the nation’s health law as three House lawmakers with ties to the movement said they’d back a U.S. spending deal that doesn’t center on ending Obamacare.
Republican Representatives Blake Farenthold of Texas, Doug Lamborn of Colorado and Dennis Ross of Florida, all of whom identify with the Tea Party, said they’d back an agreement to end the government shutdown and lift the debt ceiling if it included major revisions to U.S. tax law, significant changes to Medicare and Social Security and other policy changes.
The partial government shutdown entered its fifth day since lawmakers failed to authorize spending before the Oct. 1 start of the fiscal year. The budget standoff started when Republicans insisted on choking off funding for President Barack Obama’s Affordable Care Act, known as Obamacare, while the president has refused to negotiate.
“The president seems unwilling to give an inch on Obamacare, so, alright, where can we find other reforms?” Farenthold said in an interview at the Capitol today just after a vote on giving furloughed workers retroactive pay. “If we can make the same or bigger difference doing something other than Obamacare, I don’t see why we wouldn’t do it.”
Other lawmakers backed by the Tea Party movement, including Republican Representative Jim Jordan of Ohio, are refusing to budge on their Obamacare stance. House Majority Leader Eric Cantor said today that Republicans are demanding “fairness” under the health-care law.
“The administration continues to give special treatment to big business and to special interests and have left the working-class Americans out,” Cantor told reporters. “Just give them the same treatment.”
Representative Raul Labrador, an Idaho Republican and leading voice in the fight against Obamacare, said a change to the law “has to be on the table.”
“A one-year delay is still reasonable to ask for,” Labrador said in an interview.
Lawmakers tied to the Tea Party led a push last month to convince Republican House Speaker John Boehner to fight for major changes to Obamacare as part of the budget debate. That stalemate, which led to the first government shutdown since 1996, is now bleeding into a debate over the nation’s $16.7 trillion debt limit, which must be raised before Oct. 17 to avoid a U.S. default.
“We’ve tried a lot of things and used just about every arrow in our quiver against Obamacare,” Lamborn, 59, said today. “It has not been successful, so I think we do have to move on to the larger issues of the debt ceiling and the overall budget.”
Lamborn said he would back a debt limit increase if the deal included an equal amount of spending cuts. He said he’s also seeking a deal that includes instructions for major tax-code revisions.
“I recognize the writing on the wall,” he said.
Farenthold, 51, was a conservative radio talk-show host when he won election in 2010, defeating 28-year-incumbent Democrat Solomon Ortiz.
The Obamacare battle, he said, was for “another day.”
“It will collapse under its own weight, especially when the young people -- who are going to be under the individual mandate -- start screaming at what they’re having to pay for,” he said.
Farenthold said he’d back a spending deal with tax code changes and entitlement reforms aimed at “getting people who are able to work, back to work.”
Ross, ranked among the House’s most conservative members by both the Club for Growth and the American Conservative Union, said he shifted his position because the shutdown hasn’t resulted in changes to the Affordable Care Act. The shutdown also could hurt the party, he said.
“We’ve lost the CR battle,” Ross, referring to the continuing resolution to authorize government spending, said in an interview. “We need to move on and take whatever we can find in the debt limit.”
Ross, 53, is pushing for other changes, such as means-testing for Medicare payments and switching to a formula that may make Social Security beneficiaries’ cost-of-living increases rise more slowly. Those would be “major reforms” that should win Republican votes.
“I’m not questioning my leadership. I’m just suggesting that we need to take stock of where we’ve come and realize what it’s going to take for where we want to go,” Ross said, adding that he still favors changing the health-care law.
Ross said Republicans can claim victory for recent spending cuts, which he said are the first consecutive-year reductions in more than 50 years.
“We’ve got to be realistic about that and not go so far as that we do things that shut down the government to a great degree or default on our debt,” Ross said. “There’s room to make sure we continue on our course and not have catastrophic events.”
A spending deal would clear the way for compromises on other issues, such as immigration policy and revising the U.S. tax code, he said.
“There are a whole lot of other issues that haunted us at the election other than Obamacare,” Ross said. “I would hope there’s at least enough of us to constitute a majority of reasonable people that realize we need to give and take.”
To contact the reporter on this story: Michael C. Bender in Washington at email@example.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Jodi Schneider at firstname.lastname@example.org